All Activity

Hello, the funktion Menu->Window-Linking doesn't work in build 3698. I had to go back to 3684! The Linking window doesn't appear when the entry is marked. Regards, Uwe

Hello, Why is a different lens tag read depending on the media format? Example: CR2 - LensType from the Maker Notes is read: Lens Type Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM instead of EXIF:LensModel: Lens Model EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM The TIF photo was developed from the CR2. EXIF:LensModel: Lens Model EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM The result: different lens tags for the same lens! Greetings, Uwe

build 3698 Hello, something has changed - I just don't know how. in my standard catalogue (netcatalog, files on NAS, catalogue, thumbnail on internal SSD) the content of the field cameravendor_table-isapprovd is differently assigned with "true" or "false". In my later created test catalogue (netcatalog3, files on internal hard disk, catalogue, thumbnails on internal SSD) all entries of cameravendor_table-isapprovd=true. Therefore, I can now move and merge the previously incorrect sub-entries of cameras that already exist under a main entry without having to make the above-mentioned update in pgAdmin. Can I manually set all entries in the standard catalogue to ‘true’ for cameravendor_table-isapprovd=false? Regards, Uwe

Hello, here is an example (build 3698). All files in the folder of a photo book are displayed. The last line of the thumbnail should show the person tag. No persons are displayed in the second line of the screenshot. This is correct, because these files do not have a person tag yet. However, these files are not displayed when I go to Catalogue Panel->People->unasigned to display all files without a person tag. The bat file attached in the post above with the PostgreSQL query finds these files that Daminion does not find. What is going wrong here? regards, Uwe

Hi Rupert, This is the updated functionality in the new version. If you still need to sort the whole catalog, please expand the folders tag, select the top folder and the sort will be available again. Unfortunately, the flag cannot be added now, but we can consider it for the future

Ok, I just tested it with a query that selects all my photos (60k) and the sorting takes less than a second. So can you please add a flag or something, where people with strong computers or small databases can re-activate the sort for all pictures? THX, Rupert

Yes. The output txt file is not created. I will check it put later after the scheduled sessions are done

Hi Daria, I used FR as a test some time ago, but then uninstalled it and it hasn't been active for a long time. I deleted the ‘old FR entries’ from the database following your instructions. Have you tried my batch file on your system? Greetings, Uwe

Hello Uwe, I suspect this could be related to the files processed by facial recognition. @Oleg.Rossplease comment on this when you have a moment. Advanced > People: Is Empty works for me:

Hello, the advanced search for person "not assigned/is empty" or "is not empty" does not work. In the Tags panel->People there are 78 items without a person tag (not assigned). If I now set the condition “Person is empty” under Advanced search, no items are displayed. Conversely, no items are displayed for ‘Person is not empty’ either. I have created the following SQL query (see batch file in the attachment). The query searches the NetCatalog for all entries in the ‘mediaitems’ table for which no entry exists in the ‘people_file’ table and creates a text file with the IDs without a person tag in the folder in which the batch file is located. But the problem is: the items determined by the query do not match those from the Tags panel and vice versa and are also not among the ‘unassigned’ items in the Tags panel->People. What might I be doing wrong with the SQL query or where is the error in the Daminion query for the person tag in the Tags panel? Best regards, Uwe no_personen_tag_to_TXT.bat

Hi there, after a long time, not working on my photos, I started today and was happy to see the improvements on the Face REcognition, whith choosing folders. to be scanned, this is ready great for me. Only thing, the system found a lot of images, but make several blocks for the same person and the client keeps freezing

I'm using it on an iPad Air 4th Generation

I was able to reproduce the issue. I cannot explain why indexed tags are removed, but linear tags are kept, as well as why this file format is not taken into account when searching by people=empty. I will register this as an issue, however, since there is no full support of the file format, we will hardly fix it until the full support is introduced.

here a test file test.afpub

all the tags are assigned by Daminion

Hi Daria, logout - it's ok, person tag remains in the thumbnail view. regards, Uwe

Hi Uwe, are title, description, and copyrights assigned via Daminion, or Affinity?

Hi Uwe, could you please try to configure it and exit the catalog via Log Out instead of closing the app? Let me know if it helps

Hello, I have currently set the following view: I have deleted the colour profile and added the person tag to the display instead: when I close and restart the Daminion client, this change is lost and instead of the person tag, the colour profile is displayed again. Regards, Uwe

Hello, example format afbup - not natively supported by Daminion regarding metadata. 0. When selecting files without a person tag (person = empty), for example, the afpub format is not taken into account. I still have to test whether this applies to all natively supported formats, or Daminion should answer this question. 1. in the properties panel, the person tag of the afpub file is filled with ‘testperson’ and saved. Unlike other programmes, Daminion does not write a sidecar file for this format. This means that ‘testperson’ is only in the catalogue. 2. a ‘read tags from file’ now deletes the previously assigned person from the person tag. Together with all other tags. Irritating: Title, description and copyright are not deleted. regards, Uwe

thank you

Hello Uwe, we are working on the new version right now that will support the latest version of PostgreSQL.

Hello, how long do we have to work with the no longer supported PostgreSQL 12 version? And why is it not possible to use the current version? 2025-02-20: "The PostgreSQL Global Development Group has released an update to all supported versions of PostgreSQL, including 17.4, 16.8, 15.12, 14.17, and 13.20." https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ Regards, Uwe

Hi Uwe, it is hard to say without the backup. Please send it to us. Perhaps we can build a query to merge the fonts.

Hello, Questions: why are the fonts not all summarised under ‘Verdana’, as in the example here? The same error has existed for years with the camera tag. Also, the number of fonts summarised under ‘Verdana’ is not correct. Best regards, Uwe