Mel Posted June 20, 2014 Report Share Posted June 20, 2014 Hello, Q1: Choose Item -> Export (choose any option here), click "Export Original Files" in the "Transform" area; see the screenshot below. Now what's the functional difference between "JPEG - Original Size" and "JPEG - 100% of Original Size"? Q2: How do I define a search with "does not contain" rule? TIA -- M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Hi M, There's a great series of videos that will probably answer both questions - I don't export, so I haven't watch that video yet - but the answer to your second question is covered well in the "Part 6" video: DaminionDean Videos on YouTube Hope this helps, Russell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mel Posted June 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Thanks for reply, Russel. I was not precise enough in the 2nd question. The sample task would be to find all files with filename containing e.g. water but not waterfall. I used the "Advanced" button to define a search like 'Filename contains Water AND ....' now what? Secondly, I suppose that in the Advanced Find dialog the Append condition is always linked with AND operand thus one cannot define searches like: 'Filename contains WATER' OR 'Keyword equals WATER' Is this true? -- M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilfriedB Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 The sample task would be to find all files with filename containing e.g. water but not waterfall. I used the "Advanced" button to define a search like Mariusz, neither I was able to create a query with a negation using the "Advanced" button. However it is possible to build it using the Catalog Tags window: When you select any of the tags to be included, you left click the round button on the right of it (and the button turns green), if you want to exclude a tag, you press the Alt-key and hold it while clicking the button and it will turn red. If you want to combine more than one arguments, like in your example, you need to hold the Ctrl-key while clicking the second tag. However, before you actually click the tag, you only press the Ctrl-key. At this point, a red OR appears in the heading of the first selected tag. You can click the OR and select AND instead. No you press and hold Ctrl and Alt, then click the button next to the second argument. That creates exactly the query in your example. And Russel, is right: This is explained nicely in one of the video tutorials. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murat Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Hi Mariusz, 1. These transformation presets are equal. Thanks for noticing this - we'll remove the second preset. 2. We disabled an the "doesn't contain" condition from the Advanced Search because it worked wrong in the "many-to-many relationships in the database" (technically speaking). You can exclude exact tag matches from the query via the Tags tree as Wilfried suggested. But in this case we exclude tags from the query based on the IDs, but not a text entry, and thats work. We'll get back to this issue after releasing the 4.0 version and development of the most demanded core functionality. Thanks for pointing to this issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murat Posted June 22, 2014 Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Secondly, I suppose that in the Advanced Find dialog the Append condition is always linked with AND operand thus one cannot define searches like: 'Filename contains WATER' OR 'Keyword equals WATER' Is this true? Yep. Different tags are grouped with the AND condition, while you can select between AND , and OR for values of the same TAG, for example: (Filename contains WATER) AND (Keyword equals WATER OR Keyword equals WATERFUL OR Keyword equals WATERPOL) AND (Categories doesn't match AAAAAA AND Categories doesn't match BBBBBB) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mel Posted June 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 22, 2014 Thanks for all suggestions. BTW - Murat, if the search definition is internally translated to an sql query maybe one day you would consider a "SQL Query" window for sql geeks to define nonstandard or complex conditions using the query language? -- M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.