Joining photo markers on map at zooming is some strange

[Cactus]

At first picture are 37 + 1 + 1 + 1 photos.

 

At second - 38 + 2. Some markers joined.

 

At third - 38 + 2 (almost hidden by 38).

 

At forth - 38 + 2 (a few pixels of black marker's border visible only).

 

Why they are not joined to one marker with 40 pictures?

[Cactus]

At first picture are 37 + 1 + 1 + 1 photos.

 

At second - 38 + 2. Some markers joined.

 

At third - 38 + 2 (almost hidden by 38).

 

At forth - 38 + 2 (a few pixels of black marker's border visible only).

 

Why they are not joined to one marker with 40 pictures?

 

Any comments, Murat?

[Murat]

Sorry for the delay with answer. If this issue is still reproducible can you please send me a dump of your database?

[Cactus]

Sorry for the delay with answer. If this issue is still reproducible can you please send me a dump of your database?

 

Build 1064. It is still here. Dump is catalog file (DMC) or something else?

[Murat]

I need the dmc file if you work with local catalogs or the backup files if you work with the server catalog.

[Cactus]

I need the dmc file if you work with local catalogs or the backup files if you work with the server catalog.

 

Sent it to support email.

[Cactus]

I need the dmc file if you work with local catalogs or the backup files if you work with the server catalog.

 

Any news?

[Murat]

Sorry for the delay with response. Unfortunatelly this bug is related to the "Image Grouping" functionality that is not visible now. But once it will be released (3.5) this bug also should be fixed. If this happens early I'll put it into the what's new info.

[Cactus]

OK. I will wait. Thank you.

[Murat]

Can you please check the 1091 build.

[Cactus]

Can you please check the 1091 build.

It is better - markers joins. But too late.

[kalain]

It is better - markers joins. But too late.

 

I agree, better but not perfect.

 

First screen shot : Ok,

Second screen shot : why not. (you can't see how many images there is under hidden geo tag, tags shoud be grouped ?)

Third image : All geo tags should be grouped. You can't discern them.

Fourth image : Ok.

[Cactus]

I agree, better but not perfect.

 

First screen shot : Ok,

Second screen shot : why not. (you can't see how many images there is under hidden geo tag, tags shoud be grouped ?)

Third image : All geo tags should be grouped. You can't discern them.

Fourth image : Ok.

 

Yes, I think marks should be grouped at second screenshot, because I can't see number on lower one.