Sedat Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 If I let my images sort by filename, the result in Daminion is like following: # 1. image_10.jpg # 2. image_110.jpg # 3. image_11.jpg I would have expecet to have an ascending order of 10,11,110. Quote
emef Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 This is the binary numbering. It is best to number its files with a "0" in front of each unit: 01,02, 03 ... 09, 10, 11, 12. If more than one hundred file, then: 001 002 003 ... etc.. More than a thousand 3x = "0". Quote
Sedat Posted May 30, 2013 Author Report Posted May 30, 2013 Thanks for your hint with the leading zeros. But, as for me, I guess it's easier to sort by date instead of renaming thousands of files subsequently. Anyway it's not a critical problem. I was just wondering because other viewers are respecting alphanumeric file names. Quote
emef Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 Personally, I call my photos my name _date shooting _ file number assigned by the camera. Eg emef_20130530_dsc9123.nef or jpg (tif, psd ...).. Each file is in a directory named by the date. Quote
Murat Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 I've tried to reproduce the issue, but on my PC the items were sorted correctly: Does anyone expected the same sorting issue? Quote
Sedat Posted May 31, 2013 Author Report Posted May 31, 2013 ...on my PC the items were sorted correctly: Sorry Murat, my initial sample is wrong. I wrote the text out of my memory and just mistook the filenames. As you can see on the Daminion screenshot, the problem is that image_12 comes right after image_110 and not after image_11. The acdsee screenshot shows the correct order. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.