Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 09/19/2019 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    It would be great if, when we save searches, we could have the option to save the search only for "this catalog only" or "server-wide." Then we could create searches that apply to the whole server, e.g. "no country" search applied to any catalog on the entire server and another search that only applies only to a specific catalog, e.g. models without age and height in "studio shoots" catalog.
  2. 1 point
    I agree with Dean. On more thing regarding saving searches: There should be the possibility to Save, i.e. overwriting the existing saved search without having to key in the complete name again and a Save As, which offers the current name as default that can be changed. Currently, it always shows an empty input field and you need to key in the complete name, risking a typo and you end up have multiple saved searches with slightly similar names and lose track, which is the most recent one.
  3. 1 point
    Hi, each time I start Daminion it comes up with the search criteria shown in the screenshot. I remember that in earlier versions Daminion used to come up with the last used search criteria from the previous session. Is this a bug or a new feature? Best regards, Volker
  4. 1 point
    Really annoying! Reported more than two years ago! 😞 Is there a reason, for not fixing this?
  5. 1 point
    Hello Daria, I managed to get Daminion client build 2208 working on my Daminion server. Here I can observe the same behaviour: the client always starts with this preset: Best regards, Volker
  6. 1 point
    Wanted to share a solution I created using AWS or facial recognition and tagging. This is just the spark notes on my flow - let me know if interested in code snippets or a more detailed write-up. There are a couple solutions using lightroom and the old picasa. When testing AWS rekognition worked WAYYYY better. I am using daminion server for home - use case is photos from family members phones, gopro, drone in one place easy to access. Process Create Database of Faces in AWS 1 time step, or multiple times when adding new faces/people AWS requires an index of faces that it uses to match. I took individual pictures of people I wanted to tag cropped them to only have the subject's face and indexed them using aws's boto3 module in python. Here I specified the 'external parameter id' field as '[lastname]|[firstname]'. That way when there is a match I have the exact tag that will be added to the photo and recognizable by daminion Match Photo The process for a single photo is as follows: Index faces in the photo (the faces will be indexed with the collection created prior) (python boto3) loop through the faces and find matches (python boto3) Matches are returned as %match. If 95% or higher save tag and move onto the next photo, if less then 95-80% tag all matched faces. Here I error'd on the side of more false positives vs more false negatives Use exiftool to add all the tags saved in step 3 Automation I have a SMB drop box. All users drop photos into the box either manually or automatically with owncloud or nextcloud. Every hour a scheduled task is run that: adds create_date to photo name if not included (iphone for example does not have a unique timestamp in file name) if file does not exist in catalog continue, otherwise delete search and tag faces in photo with python script above move photo to proper picture storage location Daminion file watching service adds it to the catalog This is for all new photos, for historical photos I used a python script to scan and tag all of them. I also add a tag of face_detected if a face was detected but no match was found. This allows for re-scanning in the event you update your face index and want to rescan.
  7. 1 point
    Has HEIC thumbnails in Daminion been added yet? I tried the trial, and added the HEIC extension to allow me to import it, and on the import window it shows the thumbnails since the codec is installed on my server, but once imported into Daminion, they go to the generic icon. I need this to work before I purchase, because we have 1000s of heic images.
  8. 1 point
    Hi, It would be nice (for keyboard users) to have shortcut to open/close windows like Tag, Properties, Tray..... Something like Shift or Control + number (0..9) or F1..F12. (or anything else) Regards
  9. 1 point
    Thanks a lot. I did not find this demo program before and it is quite helpful. I installed it and yes, the problem is now corrected in the current version: the NEF file and the JPG file are both found when I search mésange.
  10. 1 point
    Yes, you're right. I tried also with 'Authors' but didn't worked. (I didn't realized it was possible to assign several Authors). So, looks like it's not possible to sort tags which can have several entries but Daminion can internaly sort keywords. for example, in this media I assigned keywords in this order V16, V15, v14, V13, V17 (as shown in Details view) but in properties panel keywords are sorted alphabeticaly !! Most of the time sorting by keywords is not very usefull but sometimes it is. So why not sorting them as it's already done in properties panel ?
  11. 1 point
    Even with port forwarding and opening things up I couldn't get through to the daminion service, though I could access the default windows IIS page. I ended up setting up a VPN and was then able to use the local address to connect.
  12. 1 point
    Hello together, is it possible to communicate here in english? This is the only way that everyone can benefit from it. Egon
  13. 1 point
    Is there any way to monitor the progress of generating AI labels? I'm attempting to generate labels for a lot of unlabeled photos (now that the "search for unassigned" bug is fixed), but it seems like a bunch of photos are not getting labeled, even after several hours. It's difficult to tell whether they aren't getting queued, whether the queue is stalled, or whether they were not processed successfully. When I look at the cvis.txt log file, I see a lot of entries like: DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:03:35,751 CVis.OrchestratorActor [29] - NextTaskMessage INFO 2020-03-19 13:03:35,760 CVis.ImageTask [29] - not found media items for processing DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:03:35,762 CVis.OrchestratorActor [29] - WorkDoneMessage DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:04:20,775 CVis.OrchestratorActor [29] - NextTaskMessage INFO 2020-03-19 13:04:20,791 CVis.ImageTask [29] - not found media items for processing DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:04:20,796 CVis.OrchestratorActor [29] - WorkDoneMessage DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:05:05,808 CVis.OrchestratorActor [33] - NextTaskMessage INFO 2020-03-19 13:05:05,818 CVis.ImageTask [33] - not found media items for processing DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:05:05,821 CVis.OrchestratorActor [33] - WorkDoneMessage DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:05:50,825 CVis.OrchestratorActor [34] - NextTaskMessage INFO 2020-03-19 13:05:50,840 CVis.ImageTask [34] - not found media items for processing DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:05:50,843 CVis.OrchestratorActor [34] - WorkDoneMessage DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:06:35,848 CVis.OrchestratorActor [35] - NextTaskMessage INFO 2020-03-19 13:06:35,859 CVis.ImageTask [35] - not found media items for processing DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:06:35,862 CVis.OrchestratorActor [35] - WorkDoneMessage When I look at my Google Cloud Vision API metrics, I see 89 requests in the past hour, but none in the past several minutes, and that's after marking 2000 photos in Daminion for labeling. BTW, in the cvis.txt log, when it does find a file, it seems like it's logging the location of it's thumbnail, not the original photo location. Is there any way to easily determine a actual photo file that has been processed? Example is: DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:33,598 CVis.OrchestratorActor [63] - NextTaskMessage DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:33,606 CVis.ImageTask [63] - 2\4e\24e1df6a-5b7b-482d-84f9-b603eca9b9c5.dat: 42880, 17164 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:33,610 CVis.ImageTask [63] - file exitst: E:\Users\Daminion\AppData\Roaming\Daminion Server\Thumbnails\2\4e\24e1df6a-5b7b-482d-84f9-b603eca9b9c5.dat INFO 2020-03-19 13:31:33,614 CVis.ImageTask [63] - start GetBuffer INFO 2020-03-19 13:31:33,624 CVis.ImageTask [63] - end GetBuffer: 42880 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:33,627 CVis.ImageTask [63] - get image from file DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:33,651 CVis.ImageTask [63] - start DetectLabels DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,333 CVis.ImageTask [63] - end DetectLabels INFO 2020-03-19 13:31:34,337 CVis.ImageTask [63] - [ { "mid": "/m/0838f", "description": "Water", "score": 0.9684016, "topicality": 0.9684016 }, { "mid": "/m/06q40", "description": "Smoke", "score": 0.891961336, "topicality": 0.891961336 }, { "mid": "/m/015s2f", "description": "Water resources", "score": 0.870399833, "topicality": 0.870399833 }, { "mid": "/m/07pw27b", "description": "Atmospheric phenomenon", "score": 0.8569148, "topicality": 0.8569148 }, { "mid": "/m/08t9c_", "description": "Grass", "score": 0.821845353, "topicality": 0.821845353 }, { "mid": "/m/049_3v", "description": "Yard", "score": 0.77845, "topicality": 0.77845 }, { "mid": "/m/025s3q0", "description": "Landscape", "score": 0.7564218, "topicality": 0.7564218 }, { "mid": "/m/0hrcj2p", "description": "Backyard", "score": 0.7451672, "topicality": 0.7451672 }, { "mid": "/m/07j7r", "description": "Tree", "score": 0.686921835, "topicality": 0.686921835 }, { "mid": "/m/0gmc028", "description": "Spray", "score": 0.677393854, "topicality": 0.677393854 } ] DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,342 CVis.ImageTask [63] - start UpdateCloudVisionTable DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,346 CVis.ImageTask [63] - end UpdateCloudVisionTable DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,350 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/0838f", "description": "Water", "score": 0.9684016, "topicality": 0.9684016 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,354 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 25 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,357 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/06q40", "description": "Smoke", "score": 0.891961336, "topicality": 0.891961336 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,361 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 1494 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,366 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/015s2f", "description": "Water resources", "score": 0.870399833, "topicality": 0.870399833 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,372 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 420 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,376 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/07pw27b", "description": "Atmospheric phenomenon", "score": 0.8569148, "topicality": 0.8569148 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,381 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 270 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,387 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/08t9c_", "description": "Grass", "score": 0.821845353, "topicality": 0.821845353 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,393 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 115 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,398 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/049_3v", "description": "Yard", "score": 0.77845, "topicality": 0.77845 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,404 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 2 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,408 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/025s3q0", "description": "Landscape", "score": 0.7564218, "topicality": 0.7564218 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,412 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 116 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,418 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/0hrcj2p", "description": "Backyard", "score": 0.7451672, "topicality": 0.7451672 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,424 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 106 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,430 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/07j7r", "description": "Tree", "score": 0.686921835, "topicality": 0.686921835 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,434 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 55 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,440 CVis.ImageTask [63] - process label: { "mid": "/m/0gmc028", "description": "Spray", "score": 0.677393854, "topicality": 0.677393854 } DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,444 CVis.ImageTask [63] - labels tag value id: 2925 DEBUG 2020-03-19 13:31:34,451 CVis.OrchestratorActor [63] - NextTaskMessage
  14. 1 point
    Hi, Members 0 2 posts Report post Posted Thursday at 11:54 PM Hi, Unfortunately the new Stand alone version does not fix the sorting issue, this function is still totally broken. Lenni
  15. 1 point
    With this bug, the standalone version became unusable.
  16. 1 point
    It would be great if you could view photos in a new window such that you could easily switch between the normal Daminion window and the map window, via ALT TAB. At the moment you can either have a small docked window (which takes up your space) or a large window where you can't easily switch back to the normal Daminion window.
  17. 1 point
    Bumping this to see if there's been any progress made the issues with AI labels -- searching for empty, recovering deleted AI labels, etc.?
  18. 1 point
    Hi folks, A quick question: is there a way to automatically group RAW and JPG together or is this still a fully manual job? Many thanks for you answer! Kind regards from the Netherlands Germie
  19. 1 point
    Hi Folks, Ik wish you all a healthy, happy and prosperous 2020! Kind regards from the Netherlands Germ Wind
  20. 1 point
    Hi, It would be better to make it work properly rather than to remove this possibility. In my case (which can be others users) I wanted to exclude all video formats (Mov, Mpeg 4, ...) In other group tag, list can be a bit longer and it will be easier and faster to exclude all in one click. Regards Alain
  21. 1 point
    Hi, I'd like to exclude all items with keyword 'Voiture' As keyword list is pretty long, I expected easier to do this in advanced panel but didn't find 'Does not contains' or 'Not equals' in condition list. Ok, I did this in long keyword list and with 'Alt' key exclude 'Voiture' Now, if I come back to advanced search panel, I got 'Not equals' selected but not listed in conditions list !!! Would be nice to add 'not equals' in conditions list.
  22. 1 point
    Is there any update on being able to search for only photos with no AI Tags?
  23. 1 point
    Hello, wouldn't the Google AI Facial Recognition violate European GDPR Rights by trasmitting the Data (faces, where each Person has it's Right on) to Google Server?
  24. 1 point
    I was selecting a batch of 1000 files, generating AI tags, and then walking away, so I don't know exactly how long it took to complete. But on my Google console, ti's showing a peak over the past 7 days of just over 200, comparable current usage, and so overall looks a lot similar to what you posted.
  25. 1 point
    I just came to the forums to report the exact same issue. I've used the new build to successfully generate AI tags for a few thousand photos, but advanced search to find empty labels shows all items. Furthermore, under the Tags pane, the number of AI Tags listed as "Unknown" never goes down, even as photos are successfully tagged and appear elsewhere in the AI tags list.
  26. 1 point
    No need to apologize, I just found strange that there was so little activity with so many "lurkers". Re. custom tags I came along to have my machine zombified ( 😉 ) but I see you already swatted the bug! Thanks again, N.
  27. 1 point
    Thank you WilfriedB, I think I understood it.
  • Create New...